Smite Surtr Change Explained: Player Reactions and Analysis

Discover how Surtr's recent changes in Smite have players divided over buffs or nerfs.

Photo of author

Jarvis the NPC

In the world of Smite, the recent Surtr change has sparked a wide range of opinions and debates among players. Let’s dive into the discussion surrounding this controversial alteration.

Summary

  • The Surtr change has led to divided opinions, with some seeing it as a nerf and others as a buff.
  • Players highlight the shift in gameplay dynamics with easier stack accumulation but potential damage loss.
  • The community debates the impact on Surtr’s playstyle and overall effectiveness in different game phases.
  • Suggestions are made for potential adjustments to balance the hero.

Player Reactions: A Debate of Buffs or Nerfs

The post by ProcuredHat on the Surtr change in Smite has stirred up a lively discussion within the community. While some players argue that the alteration has made Surtr easier to play and increased early-game pressure, others point out the significant damage reduction that can impact late-game performance.

In-Depth Analysis: Understanding the Gameplay Shift

dabicus_maximus offers a critical perspective, noting that reaching 100 stacks with Surtr was challenging in most games, suggesting a different focus on gameplay dynamics.

Tumps07 counters with the opinion that the change is a buff, making it easier to accumulate stacks post-laning phase and promoting a more engaging playstyle.

xScratchh brings a nuanced take, highlighting the balance between risk and reward in the new stack accumulation mechanism and its impact on mid to late-game strategies.

The Verdict: A Shift in Usability and Player Experience

SkruntNoogles offers an insightful view, emphasizing the positive aspects of the change in making Surtr’s gameplay more active and rewarding strategic decisions during team fights.

iFeeLPaiNx expresses satisfaction with the new Surtr gameplay, reflecting a general sentiment of improved player experience.

AllSkillzN0Luck acknowledges the complexity of the changes, recognizing the trade-off between early-game nerfs and late-game buffs in Surtr’s playstyle.

Outso187 questions the perception of the change as a nerf, advocating for a more dynamic and engaging gameplay experience with increased player agency.

IntrepidCat8200 and Arzanyos propose alternative adjustments to further enhance Surtr’s gameplay experience, emphasizing the importance of balancing usability and effectiveness.