League of Legends fans are buzzing about Caedrel’s recent MSI player tierlist, sparking heated debates and criticisms.
Summary
- Fans are divided over Caedrel’s placements, particularly in regards to Mikyx.
- Many disagree with Mikyx’s high ranking, citing his poor performance in the spring split.
- Some users feel Caedrel’s descriptions and rankings lack consistency, especially in comparing players.
Controversy over Mikyx
One user, CudaBarry, expressed disbelief over Mikyx’s A-tier placement, stating, ‘Can’t believe I watched this whole video, it’s way better this way giving context to each pick rather than putting the tier list on Twitter and letting hell let loose. Anyway I think Mikyx is too high given his performance in spring split, he was awful.’
Inconsistencies in Rankings
NoahsArk19 highlighted inconsistencies in Caedrel’s rankings, particularly in the comparison between G2/FNC players. They mentioned, ‘The way he described Razork/Noah/Jun you’d think at least one of them would be ranked higher than their G2 counterpart. But nope. There is no way Mikyx should be in A tier based on his performance this entire year.’
Community Consensus
Despite the disagreements, some users like KKilikk found the tierlist accurate, stating, ‘As a completely unbiased watcher I strongly agree with these tierlists especially mid and ADC.’
Overall, the League of Legends community is deeply divided on Caedrel’s MSI player tierlist, with opinions ranging from strong support to outright criticism. The debate continues to rage on, reflecting the passion and scrutiny within the community.
