When Todd Howard shared Bethesda’s focus on finding ways to increase its output, the gaming community had varied opinions on whether quantity should be a priority over quality.
Summary
- Bethesda’s emphasis on output expansion raises concerns about compromising game quality for quantity.
- Some users question if Bethesda’s issues lie in game design and engine limitations rather than output.
- The community remains skeptical about Bethesda’s ability to improve despite increased output targets.
Avenger1324
Both Fallout and The Elder Scrolls are large series deserving dedicated teams for new games. It raises concerns when important anniversaries pass by with no updates. Microsoft’s acquisition adds talent, but rushing games may hurt quality.
DeficientDefiance
Are quantity concerns really the root issue for Bethesda? Some users question if the problem lies within game development processes.
ms7398msake
Users express skepticism, referencing the popular song ‘Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies,’ hinting at doubts about Bethesda’s intentions.
SpanishBrowne
After years on Starfield, doubts linger on Bethesda’s capabilities to deliver quality products with tighter deadlines.
Gaming communities around the world are buzzing with reactions to Todd Howard’s statements. While increased output may seem like a positive step at first glance, gamers are wary of potential compromises in game quality. Bethesda’s history with titles like Skyrim and Fallout has set high expectations that some fear might be jeopardized by an emphasis on quantity over excellence. As the gaming landscape evolves, it’s clear that fans value both innovation and the preservation of standards. Whether Bethesda can strike a balance between output expansion and maintaining their renowned quality remains to be seen.
