So, a tattoo artist got into a legal scuffle over their design in ‘NBA 2K’ models. Drama, drama, drama! Let’s dive into the Reddit chaos surrounding this heated battle…
Summary
- Artists’ financial rights post-payment debated.
- IP ownership clash over virtual use of tattoo designs.
- Comparison drawn to other video game model likeness disputes.
SaltTM’s Question
One user raised an intriguing query about claiming a person’s tattoo likeness without being the individual in question. That’s a head scratcher!
xkeepitquietx’s Observation
Randy Orton’s tattoo artist’s win against 2K for WWE 2K24 sheds light on the intricacies of such legal battles. Interesting precedent, indeed!
DarthBluntSaber’s Insight
The debate around ownership rights post-payment is an age-old dilemma. Does buying art equate to full ownership, or is there more to it? The virtual realm adds a fascinating twist!
GlupShittoOfficial’s Perspective
Virtual application and commercialization of tattoo art in games spark ethical debates. Would using such art for custom characters violate the original artist’s IP? Nike might want to chime in on this too!
