Fortnite players are divided on the current Ranked system, with some missing the old Arena mode. The removal of features like Siphon and the lack of a clear scoring system are points of contention.
Summary
- Players miss the clear scoring system and incentives in Arena.
- Some appreciate the strategic gameplay promoted by the removal of Siphon.
- There are concerns about disabled playlists affecting the overall experience.
Community Feedback on Ranked System
Some players argue that the removal of Siphon promotes strategic gameplay by eliminating ‘head empty aggro’ tendencies. This change forces players to be more thoughtful in their engagements and overall tactics, leading to a more diverse array of strategies in the end game.
Comments on Scoring System
Players express frustration over the vague progression in the current Ranked system, missing the clear point system that used to exist in Arena. Knowing exactly how many points each action earns was a motivating factor that is lacking in the current setup.
Concerns about Disabled Playlists
Issues with disabled playlists, like Solo No Build being restricted, have sparked debates within the community. Some players feel that these limitations hinder their enjoyment and freedom to choose the game mode that suits their preferences.
The ongoing discussions highlight the mixed feelings among Fortnite players regarding the evolution of the game’s competitive modes. While some embrace the changes as promoting strategic depth, others long for the simplicity and clarity of the old Arena mode. As Epic Games continues to refine the Fortnite experience, the community eagerly waits to see how these diverging opinions will shape the future of the game.
