In the vibrant and ever-evolving world of Dota, one recent discussion that caught my eyes was the apparently contentious Pos4 role. The thread starter, Marconidas, a dedicated Dota player, was inquisitively tackling this debate, expressing his puzzlement over the popularity of Pos4, especially in the Brazil scene.
Summary
- Pos4 role is often viewed as attracting players who shirk responsibility.
- Often described as a ‘non-core’ role, which allows for more flexibility and less pressure.
- A sense of greed and independence are tied with the role.
Passing the Buck?
A sentiment echoed by the commenter ‘noobindoorgrower’ portrays the Pos4 role as a shelter for those veering away from the harsh criticism of underperforming. This insightful comment depicted the perceived liberty accompanying the role, where there’s less finger-pointing despite any potential lack of impact.
Steep Learning Curve
TheGalator, on the other hand, posits that while Pos4 might be conceptually the toughest role to master in Dota, it ironically attracts, in general, the less skillful batch of players. Clearly, this opinion implies that being a Pos4 player requires finesse, a trait not always found in its player base.
Reaping Benefits
Mango9222 enunciates another key factor contributing to the Pos4 appeal, stating that as a Pos4 player, you are permitted to be notably greedier, often reaching the stature of being a core hero. He further notes that Pos4 players are often less dependent on team dynamics, thus asserting that well-played, the role might be one of the most rewarding on the field.
Wrapping this up, it seems evident that the Pos4 role in Dota is a tumultuous space, but fraught with potential and appeal. The reasons players flock towards it are as varied as the role’s implications in the game. So whether it’s dodging responsibility, mastering a challenging role, or being drawn by the promise of greed, Pos4 attracts Dota players across the world for all reasons and none.
