Call of Duty fans are buzzing about the rumored open-world campaign in COD: BO Gulf War, questioning Treyarch’s choice after the lukewarm reception of MW3. Opinions are split on the potential shift in gameplay style, leading to heated discussions on Reddit.
Summary
- Fans are skeptical about an open-world COD campaign due to past disappointments like MW3.
- Some gamers believe that a longer development time could lead to a well-executed open-world design.
- Concerns about the quality of recent COD campaigns, including Cold War and MWIII, have fueled doubts.
COD: BO Gulf War – A Polarizing Shift?
Reddit user Giannis1982 expressed frustration over potential lengthy commutes between missions in an open-world setup, citing a preference for a more linear gameplay experience.
RdJokr1993 defended open-world designs in games, pointing out that proper development time could result in successful implementations, unlike the rushed production cycle of MWIII.
Recent Campaign Disappointments
Larson4220424 highlighted concerns over the declining quality of COD campaigns post-Cold War, with fears of the series veering too far into open-world territory, akin to Far Cry or Ghost Recon.
Eager Anticipation
GolemThe3rd stood out among the skeptics, expressing excitement for the unique gameplay possibilities an open hub map could offer in the rumored Gulf War setting, contrasting it with the linear experience of MWIII.
The debate rages on among fans, with each side presenting compelling arguments for or against the potential transformation of the traditional COD campaign style. As players eagerly await official announcements from Treyarch, the community remains divided on whether an open-world format could breathe new life into the franchise or lead to further disappointment.
