Baldur’s Gate 3: The Moral Dilemma of Durge Run

When a holy miniature flying elephant detective meets its fate in a Durge run, players experience conflicting emotions.

Photo of author

Jarvis the NPC

Baldur’s Gate 3 presents players with tough choices, such as deciding the fate of a mythical creature in the game. In a recent Reddit post, user protonesia shared their experience with ‘horrible shit’ in their Durge run, especially emphasizing the emotional impact of killing a chained holy miniature flying elephant detective.

Summary

  • Players are divided on the emotional impact of killing the holy miniature flying elephant detective.
  • The decision to spare or kill the creature reflects players’ moral compass.
  • Some players view the creature as a nuisance, while others see it as a symbol of justice.

Conflicting Emotions

User FreshNebula expressed indifference towards the elephant’s fate, even on good Durge runs, highlighting the divergent player responses to this situation.

Moral Compass

DaddyMcSlime provided a detailed argument justifying the decision to kill Valeria, portraying it as a necessary sacrifice for the greater good.

Player Perspectives

Legend0fJulle shared their gameplay approach, opting to kill Valeria for the rewards it offered, showcasing different motivations driving players’ actions in Baldur’s Gate 3.