Getting down to the nitty-gritty of Hearthstone, a hands-on card game that is much loved by its fan base, players’ opinions differ greatly on what constitutes a ‘Diamond level’ player. Some believe it to be a show of elite skills, while others opine it’s more about endurance.
Summary
- Public sentiment leans more towards Diamond status being a measure of dedication rather than skill.
- Claims of ‘rigged mulligans’ for non-paying customers largely refuted by the majority.
- Diamond 5 ranking not considered equivalent to ‘top 20%’ regardless of player type.
The Diamond Debate
Are the Diamond rank players the creme de la creme, or is it more of an endurance run to the top? User russian— wittily remarks ‘I believe D5 and further is about endurance and dedication, not skill’. Adding on, D0nkeyHS jests ‘No way 50% of human players are at D5’.
Is There a Mulligan Conspiracy?
The theory of mulligans being ‘rigged’ for non-paying customers frequently recurs within the Hearthstone discourse. User denn23rus refutes this claim, saying ‘HSReplay reliably proves, no deviations from stats between F2P players and those who pay.’
Lower Level Lament
Adding comic relief to the discussion, No_Succotash_1847 questions ‘Are there even humans below Diamond?’, an amusing way of questioning the skill level required for lower ranks.
Through the droll humour, insightful commentary and astute observation, it is clear that the notion of skill regarding Hearthstone’s Diamond rank remains a bone of contention within the community. Whether it is a measure of elite prowess or sheer perseverance, the debate continues, keeping the embers of discourse alive and the game ever engaging.
